How much does Bito AI cost?
Bito AI costs $12 per seat a month for AI Code Reviews on the Team plan and $20 per seat on Professional, both billed annually, or $15 and $25 if you pay month to month. Enterprise is custom. Those are the only published prices. Bito's other two products, AI Architect and Governor, are usage-based and every tier says "contact us".
That split matters when you are budgeting. If you came to Bito for pull request reviews, you can work out the cost on a napkin. If you came for AI Architect, the codebase knowledge graph that feeds context to coding agents, there is no number until you talk to sales. The figures below come from the Bito pricing page and Bito's billing documentation, checked in October 2026.
Bito pricing at a glance
| Product and plan | Price | What is included |
|---|---|---|
| AI Code Reviews, Free | $0 | Individual use, PR summaries, fair use policy |
| AI Code Reviews, Team | $12 per seat a month annual, $15 monthly | Up to 25 seats, 5,000 lines per seat a month, then $5 per 1,000 lines, hosted only, no trial |
| AI Code Reviews, Professional | $20 per seat a month annual, $25 monthly | Unlimited seats, custom review guidelines, Jira and Confluence, CI/CD reviews, 14-day trial, self-hosting for $5 per seat a month |
| AI Code Reviews, Enterprise | Custom | Cross-repo impact analysis powered by AI Architect, SSO and SAML, on-prem, dedicated CSM |
| AI Architect, Professional | Quote, usage-based | Codebase knowledge graph, technical design and impact assessment, grounded code generation, MCP for Cursor, Claude Code and Codex |
| AI Architect, Enterprise | Quote, usage-based | Adds Jira, Confluence, Google Docs and observability indexing, self-hosting, SSO |
| Governor, Professional and Enterprise | Quote, usage-based, model costs passed through | Code context engine and model router for coding agents |
Bito AI Code Reviews cost for 10, 20 and 50 developers
Seat math is simple as long as you stay inside the included lines. Here is the list price before any overage, on annual billing.
| Team size | Team plan | Professional plan |
|---|---|---|
| 10 developers | $120 a month, $1,440 a year | $200 a month, $2,400 a year |
| 20 developers | $240 a month, $2,880 a year | $400 a month, $4,800 a year |
| 50 developers | Not available, Team stops at 25 seats | $1,000 a month, $12,000 a year |
The number to watch is lines reviewed. Each seat includes 5,000 lines a month, pooled across the workspace, and Bito counts changed lines in each pull request diff plus relevant context lines. A 20-person team gets a pool of 100,000 lines. A busy month with a big refactor or a dependency migration can pass that, and every extra 1,000 lines costs $5, so 40,000 lines over the pool adds $200. Admins can set a monthly overage cap, which blocks reviews once it is hit, or leave it unlimited.
Two smaller details catch teams out. Seats in the default mode are bought automatically when a new Git handle opens a reviewed pull request, so contractors and bots can add to the bill. And the Professional trial stops after 15 review runs per user, so a trial on a large monorepo may end before you have a fair picture.
How much does Bito AI Architect cost?
Bito does not publish a price for AI Architect. Its docs say the price is scoped in a sales conversation and scales with the size of your indexed codebase and the volume of requests from your coding agents and analysis workflows. Both tiers, Professional and Enterprise, show "contact us", and there is a trial button on Professional.
What you are buying is a knowledge graph of your repositories that coding agents query through MCP, plus technical design and impact assessment inside Jira, Linear and Slack. Enterprise adds indexing of Jira and Confluence content, Google Docs and observability data, along with self-hosting. That is a useful product for a team running Cursor, Claude Code or Codex across a large codebase and wanting those agents to stop guessing.
The catch for a buyer is predictability. A usage-based quote tied to codebase size and agent traffic is hard to forecast before you know how much your agents will call it. Ask Bito for the unit, the overage rate and what happens at the cap before you sign, and get the answer in writing.
Is Bito AI worth it for a small team?
For pull request reviews, often yes. At $12 to $20 per seat on annual billing, Bito is one of the cheaper paid AI review tools, and the included line pool covers a normal month for most small teams. The Team plan has no trial, so start on Professional's 14 days if you want to test first.
For AI Architect, it depends on what problem you are solving. If your engineers live in coding agents and the pain is agents that do not understand how your services fit together, a knowledge graph built for agents is the right shape. If the pain is people, new hires who cannot find where things are handled, QA asking engineers how a flow works, a lead answering the same questions in Slack every day, you need search and answers that anyone on the team can use, and a quote-based agent product is a lot of process for that job.
A quick test: list the last ten questions about your code that someone asked out loud. If most were asked by a person, not an agent, price a shared Q&A tool before you book the AI Architect call.
Bito pricing compared with other codebase context tools
| Tool | Published price | Who it serves | Code hosts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bito AI Architect | No, usage-based quote | Coding agents through MCP, plus Jira, Linear and Slack | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket |
| Sourcegraph Enterprise | From $16,000 a year | Developers searching a large estate | Most code hosts |
| Augment Code | Flat plans plus metered usage | Developers in the IDE and agents | GitHub and others |
| Unblocked | $29 per user a month annual | People asking about code, Slack and Jira | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket |
| CodeIndex | $49, $149 or $499 a month per team, annual | Everyone on the team, plus scripts and agents through a REST API | GitHub only |
If Sourcegraph is also on your list, our Sourcegraph pricing breakdown walks through the Enterprise minimum, and the Augment Code pricing guide explains its metered usage and fee.
What CodeIndex costs instead
CodeIndex publishes flat team prices. Starter is $49 a month billed annually ($99 month to month) for 5 users, 10 repositories and 1,000 queries. Pro is $149 a month billed annually ($299 monthly) for 20 users, 50 repositories, 10,000 queries and REST API access. Enterprise is $499 a month billed annually ($999 monthly) for unlimited users and repositories, 30,000 queries and SSO with SAML. Every plan starts with a 14-day trial of the plan you pick.
For that you get one shared index of your GitHub repositories, semantic search that returns files, line ranges and scores, and explain and architecture answers that cite every file they used. Agents and internal tools can call the same index through the API with Bearer keys.
The honest limits: CodeIndex does not review pull requests, does not ship an MCP server, and indexes GitHub only. If automated PR review is the main job, Bito's per-seat review plans are a reasonable buy and the two tools can sit side by side. If the main job is helping people understand the code, a flat plan avoids both a seat count and a usage quote. And once AI tools start multiplying across your stack, it helps to track every SaaS and cloud bill in one place so per-seat and usage charges do not drift unnoticed.
How to get a fair Bito quote
- Bring numbers. Total lines of code across the repositories you want indexed, the number of developers running agents and a rough count of agent sessions a day. Usage-based quotes go better when you show the inputs.
- Ask for the unit. Find out whether you are billed by indexed lines, by requests, by tokens or a mix, and what the overage rate is.
- Cap the downside. Ask for a monthly ceiling or a committed amount with a fixed rate above it.
- Separate the products. Code review seats, AI Architect and Governor are priced differently. Make sure the quote shows each line on its own.
- Price the alternative. Put a published-price option such as a tool for asking questions about your codebase next to the quote, so the comparison is real.
Frequently asked questions
How much does Bito AI cost?
Bito AI Code Reviews costs $12 per seat per month on the Team plan and $20 on Professional when billed annually, or $15 and $25 month to month. Enterprise is custom. AI Architect and Governor are usage-based and quoted by sales, scaled by the size of your indexed codebase and request volume.
Is Bito AI free?
Bito has a free tier for individual use that covers PR summaries under a fair use policy. Team plans are paid. Professional comes with a 14-day trial with no credit card, limited to 15 code review runs per user, and AI Architect and Governor offer trials through their sales flow.
How much does Bito AI Architect cost?
Bito does not publish AI Architect prices. Both the Professional and Enterprise tiers say contact us, and Bito's docs explain that pricing scales with the size of your indexed codebase and the volume of usage from your coding agents and analysis workflows, so every customer gets a custom quote.
What counts as a seat in Bito?
For Git code review, a seat goes to each Git handle that submits pull requests reviewed by Bito. For IDE code review, seats go to workspace users. Seats are billed per user per month, mid-month additions are prorated, and the default seat mode buys new seats automatically as needed.
Does Bito charge for extra lines of code?
Yes. Team and Professional include 5,000 lines of code per seat a month, pooled across the workspace, and charge $5 for each additional 1,000 lines. Lines counted are changed lines in pull request diffs plus relevant context lines. Admins can cap monthly overage or set it to unlimited.
What is a cheaper alternative to Bito AI Architect?
If you need searchable, cited answers about private GitHub repositories for people and scripts rather than a knowledge graph inside coding agents, CodeIndex costs a published $49, $149 or $499 a month billed annually for the whole team, with a REST API on Pro and Enterprise.